Pastoral Report Articles 

  • 17 Aug 2015 7:29 PM | Perry Miller, Editor (Administrator)

    In an article posted in the NYTimes by Dr ROBERT KLITZMAN, M.D on August 13, 2015, Dr Klitzman, MD comments:

    "Eventually, my patient dying from cancer did speak with a chaplain. I noticed him visiting her one day as I walked by her door. I again spotted him two days later heading toward her door. The next morning, I thought that she looked calmer, more relieved than I’d seen her in weeks. She still had unremitting fevers and died a few months later, in that room. But the chaplain had helped her, I felt, in a way that I and medical treatment could not.

    I still regret my silence with that patient, but have tried to learn from it. Doctors themselves do not have to be spiritual or religious, but they should recognize that for many patients, these issues are important, especially at life’s end. If doctors don’t want to engage in these conversations, they shouldn’t. Instead, a physician can simply say: “Some patients would like to have a discussion with someone here about spiritual issues; some patients wouldn’t. If you would like to, we can arrange for someone to talk with you.”

    Unfortunately, countless patients feel uncomfortable broaching these topics with their doctors. And most physicians still never raise it.

    Certainly this article must encourage Clinical Chaplains to become even more proactive within their institution and with physicians to be a vital member of the medical team to provide care and counseling in such heartbreaking situations.

    Let's also hope that chaplains who are called upon in this role are well trained as clinical chaplains, equally versed in matters of faith and theology but equally true, and some times even more important, they have a solid and informed utilization of the social sciences in the field of counseling and psychotherapy along with a generous amount of self-understanding and use of self in the pastoral engagement. There must be a creative tension between both disciplines and utilization of self in clinical practice.

    The recent critique of chaplains in their work with patients in similar situations as described by Dr Klitzman, Raymond Lawrence in recent published articles on the Pastoral Report, calls into question how well prepared are chaplains to enter into such a clinical arena with such patients. 

    Perry Miller, Editor

  • 17 Aug 2015 12:18 AM | Perry Miller, Editor (Administrator)

    Francine Hernandez, Coordinator for NCTS - East, announces the dates and venue for the gathering of the National Clinical Training Seminar-East.

    Please place on your calendar the dates of November 2-3, 2015.

    The venue is the Loyola Retreat Center, Morristown, New Jersey.

    The NCTS training event is designed for Supervisors-in-Training, Pastoral Counselors and Psychotherapists, CPE Interns and Residents, Clinical Chaplains, Training CPE Supervisors, etc.

    Howard Friedman and a portion of his team (affiliate with A.K.Rice) will provide the leadership to focus on group work at the Fall NCTS.

    Further information will be provided relative to the theme of the training event.

    Please use the Registration Form posted below to register.

    Download: NCTS-East Registration Form

    Francine Hernandez, Coordinator for NCTS-East

  • 10 Aug 2015 7:39 PM | Perry Miller, Editor (Administrator)

    Editor's Note: Bill Scar, CPSP President, sent the following message to all members of the CPSP Governing Council:

    To All Members of the CPSP Governing Council,


    We now look forward to the upcoming meeting of the CPSP Governing Council, which has been revised to become a cyber meeting. As you know this change was indeed the result of many concerns expressed about total costs to the CPSP and to individuals for this business meeting. In addition, there were those who indicated that they could not make it to New Jersey and asked us to find some arrangement for them to be "present" electronically.

    The solution to these concerns was to move creatively to cyber meeting technology for the entire event. Although we cannot make everyone happy about this decision, we can ask for everyone to cooperate and help us to make the very most of this opportunity to work together using the latest in media.

    Our success will depend on the good faith efforts of everyone involved, and this will move our beloved CPSP forward into the 21st century at last. Individual Chapters and committees are already using the Internet. The willing spirits and faithful example of our Governing Council members next month will redound to the benefit of future events and our future leaders. This is really about our future, at a time when other clinical organizations are stagnating or terminating their programs.

    In concurrence with our General Secretary, Raymond Lawrence, I am calling the Governing Council into session to begin at 3 p.m. on Sunday, September 20th. The schedule will be organized to take advantage of the possibilities afforded by this form of meeting technology. The meeting will end no later than 3 p.m. on Monday, September 21st.

    Our ethic is fulfilled when we bring together the input from all parties. Right now, the three Chapters [Chapter of Chapters, Diplomate Chapter, and Executive Chapter] that form the Governing Council, along with our Standing Committees, are meeting to complete their work, from which the agenda and schedule will be finalized. At that time, participants will be informed of the procedures for connecting to the GC meeting. We have already been testing the technology, and it is superior to what was available even just a year ago.

    We are excited to initiate a new format for engaging one another and the work that must be done. Neither the meeting nor we have to be perfect. With patience, good will, and a spiritual blessing or two, we will learn and we will succeed.


    Bill Scar, President

  • 05 Aug 2015 12:08 AM | Perry Miller, Editor (Administrator)

    Publisher described in its email announcement as:

    "Scientists and scholars representing diverse disciplines and worldviews describe and interpret their experience of feeling called to a particular life path or vocation. The spectrum of perspectives represented in this collection ranges from atheist neuroscientists to agnostic psychologists to devout theologians. This collection functions as the definitive reference guide to callings, while serving as fascinating reading - especially to readers who have ever tried to make sense of a calling."

    I've not yet read the book but given one of our own, CPSP Diplomate Harold Ellens, is one of the editors and contributors, it must be a substantive examination of what it means to be "called" from a variety of perspectives, not just clergy who want to corner the market place on the idea.

    One drawback is that Amazon lists the price of the book as $48. Has the publisher not heard of E-books that can be downloaded at a reasonable price?

    The Pastoral Report will be interested in your response to the book.

    Perry Miller, Editor

  • 01 Aug 2015 12:02 AM | Perry Miller, Editor (Administrator)

    Join us for this year’s NCTS-West at Christ the King Retreat Center in Sacramento, California.  

    This will be an intensive, experiential, residential conference intended to expand your clinical awareness and deepen your capacity to provide pastoral care. Over three days we will create a temporary learning organization offering an opportunity to notice how we function in groups and the institutions in which we work—without the pressures and politics of the actual workplace. In this unique environment, insights can be developed that help increase our influence and effectiveness.
 This is the first CPSP Group Relations Conference co-hosted with Grex, the West Coast affiliate of the A K Rice Institute, offering CPSP the opportunity to work with highly experienced Group Relations practitioners in a focused and reflective environment.

    Due to the unique goals of this training model, the number of participants at this conference will be strictly limited. Registrants will pay a significantly reduced cost for this all-inclusive event.

    > For conference fees and registration, go to the NCTS-West web site:


    > What is the relationship between my personal and pastoral identities and my professional role?

    > How in my role do I affect the individuals, groups, organizations, and institutions that I work in, and how do they, in turn, impact me and my ability to stay in role? > Where do I get the authority to do my work?

    > What is my experience of leading and following? > What does my training help me to see, and what might my training cause me to miss seeing? > How are the human needs to belong and connect manifest in the complex environments in which we work? 


    While group-relations conference learning is a very individual matter, there are common outcomes for CPSP members that could include: 
    > Increasing appreciation of the power of the group unconscious, for example, in CPE and your CPSP chapter.

    > Enhancing awareness of self in relation to the group dynamics present with patients and families we serve.

    > Noticing the group dynamics within interdisciplinary care teams and learning how to work in them effectively. 


    The conference will help you understand Boundaries, Authority, Role, and Task (BART) as they are applied. In addition, each participant will be part of an Application Group and receive individualized consultation on their unique work situation. After the conference, a staff-hosted online Video Post-Conference will offer the opportunity to continue to integrate the experience and apply the learning at work. 


    Participation in an experiential group-relations conference is a requirement for all CPSP Supervisors-in-Training (SITs) prior to being certified as Diplomates. It is also an invaluable clinical learning experience for all Clinical Chaplains and Pastoral Counselors committed to excellence. For those certified as CPSP Diplomates in Pastoral Supervision and Psychotherapy, it goes without saying that a thorough understanding of group relations is absolutely essential. 


    Jack Lampl, Director, is the past-president and current board member of the A K Rice Institute for the Study of Social Systems and of Grex. He has been collaborating with CPSP for the past three years to enhance the quality of clinical training and broaden the exposure to group relations concepts. He is a regular staff member at group-relations conferences at the Leadership Institute of the University of San Diego.

    Micki Seligson, Associate Director, is a Jungian Analyst, former board member of the A K Rice Institute, Senior Research Associate, Project Director, Founder, The National Institute on Out of School Time, Wellesley College Centers for Women, Wellesley MA (ret.)


    David Roth, Administrator, is a Diplomate CPE supervisor and director of spiritual care at Kaiser Permanente in Northern California, co-founder of NCTS-West, general editor of the Boisen Books Project, and a member of the board of directors of Grex.

    Ed Luckett, Jr., Associate Administrator, holds an M.Div. degree, is Hospice and Palliative Care Chaplain for Kaiser Permanente, and Teaching Elder in the Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.).

    Additional Consultants

    Kate Regan holds a doctorate in Organizational Psychology from the Wright Institute in Berkeley, CA, as well as a Master’s degree in Religion from Fordham University, in New York. She has over 30 years of experience working with public, private, and not-for-profit organizations as both an internal and an external consultant. 

    Tom Butler holds an M.Div. degree and is in private practice. He is a former board member of the A K Rice Institute. 
    Mojgan Jahan is a clinical psychologist with over 30 years of clinical experience. In addition to treating individuals with chronic medical conditions, traumas, anxiety, depression, and relationship concerns, she conducts workshops and trains other medical providers. 

    Isabelle Reiniger, LCSW, is in private practice in Chicago and Evanston, IL; previously Group Psychotherapist at the Chicago Institute for Psychoanalysis.


    David Roth NCTS-West Director

  • 20 Jul 2015 11:59 PM | Perry Miller, Editor (Administrator)

    The Current Crisis in Healthcare Chaplaincy and Spiritual Care(An Extended Review of Spiritual Care in Practice: Case Studies in Healthcare Chaplaincy George Fitchett & Steve Nolan, Editors)

    Part Three

    Raymond J. Lawrence

    I The Patient

    Angela is a blonde, blue-eyed, petite 17-year-old who, after a family argument, lost control of her car on an icy road and suffered a severed upper spine. She was paralyzed from the neck down, with no prospect of remedial treatment, suddenly an almost certain lifelong quadriplegic.

    The female Catholic chaplain visited her for four “rapport-building visits” and then used the Spiritual Assessment Tool designed by the spirituality guru, Christine Puchalski. The Spiritual Assessment Tool recommends putting the following questions to the patient:

    - Do you have spiritual or religious beliefs that help you cope during this time? 
    What importance do your beliefs have for you at this time?
    Are you a member of a religious or spiritual community? 
    Are there any particular spiritual or religious activities important to your well-being while you are in the hospital?

    On reading this list of four, my first thought was that if I were a patient suffering from such a catastrophic, life altering event, and a chaplain came asking me such questions, I would call security and have them removed from my room. My second fantasy was that if in the unlikely event I had any spirit left in me I might play with the chaplain and reply to the first question, "Yes. My god is a large cosmic cat who is coming soon to deliver me from this nightmare, and take me to cat heaven."

    The basic Puchalski theology is that religion is something like a Swiss Army Knife, a little tool with many uses that often comes in handy in a pinch. That's what you get when you turn a physician into an expert on pastoral care and counseling.

    Next, the chaplain used what she calls her own specially devised "Spiritual Assessment Tool" that leads to discussions of how patients feel centered or anchored, called or motivated, whether they feel connected to relationships beyond themselves, and contribute to the good of the world and/or the good of others in grand or small ways. It is not clear why the chaplain needed two sets of so-called Spiritual Assessment Tools. One seems about as inhumane as the other. The chaplain wrote that she weaves the questions into conversations, presumably in order that the patient will not feel surveyed.

    Angela, it turned out, was a member of a small Protestant church and had not been attending or engaging in any religious practices. But now she was praying several times a day and having the Bible read to her. Obviously she could not lift the book to read on her own.

    For the first days after her accident, Angela was in denial, expecting to go home soon. Her mother, too, was in denial, promising her that if Angela prayed hard enough, God would give her a miracle. And of course, the chaplain was asked by Angela to pray for that same miracle, which she did. (What are chaplains for anyway?)

    The chaplain thought Angela to be coping adequately in the early days after the accident, though she thought Angela to be unaware of the likely permanence of the injury. But it would have been clear to any clinical observer that Angela was in massive denial. During this period the chaplain discussed with Angela how God was working in her life. The chaplain believed that God is always with us, especially in our deepest darkness. That Angela has just been made a quadriplegic but that God is with her is the ultimate non sequitur driven by denial.

    Angela's pastor came to visit, but the chaplain reported that Angela does not relate to him.

    Into the second week of hospitalization Angela's illusions, hopes, and prayers began to fade. She stopped caring for herself, refused to work with the psychologist, and stopped eating and drinking. The chaplain nevertheless persevered in her visits, laying aside her "spiritual resources" agenda and most of her pious defense of God, and finally began to listen quietly to Angela's despair. "I have lost everything! Absolutely everything!" was her cry. And so it seems. Who in the world would not feel exactly the same way? The chaplain finds the emotional barrage a bit disorienting and difficult to bear, but she is for a space of time blessedly quiet, finally. The chaplain silently comforts herself (but not Angela, thank God!) with the belief that God is with us always, even in our deepest darkness. And it appears that the chaplain blessedly and to her credit stayed relatively quiet with Angela in her despair, if only for a while.

    The chaplain then thinks to herself, "Angela has lost her spiritual center." (The meaning "spiritual center" is not exegeted.) Certainly Angela has lost the will to live. Certainly we can agree that Angela has experienced a horrifying life-altering blow at age 17, a blow from which she will likely never much recover, and as a result, it is not even clear that she will recover the will to live. What else does the chaplain need to know? And if Angela could find a "spiritual center" would her anguish be over?

    The next phase of the relationship between Angela and the chaplain is full of discussion topics about the power of prayer, the power of God, whether God actually reached down and broke Angela's neck, or not, as well as the discussion of several biblical texts introduced by the chaplain. The chaplain is increasingly propelled into a catechetical mode. It's as if she were instructing a potential novice in the mysteries of the Christian faith. And the chaplain's lines in the verbatim sections become significantly longer than the patient's, usually an indicator of a chaplain's dysfunction. Pastoral counseling has collapsed and the chaplain has morphed into a catechist or propagandist. The chaplain says to the patient, for example:

    "I believe that God's will for us is always related to what is truly good for us, but that in the middle of a painful situation, especially one as painful as yours, it's hard to find the good. With time, though, we might see it."

    Yes, perhaps. And with time we might not see it. My thought in first reading this was the wish to be able to send this Pollyanna chaplain down to the underworld to give that bit of pious wisdom to all the dead from Auschwitz. She could report back, "It's hard to see the good in those deaths, but we know it must be there, because God is good."

    The chaplain, as pocket philosopher, has lost her way.

    "Suffering is so hard to understand," says the chaplain, in a further display of banality. And then she expresses surprise and dismay that Angela thinks that God actually reached down and severed her spine. Why wouldn't Angela think that? Omnipotence means the power to do anything.

    Discussions ensue as to whether God is responsible for the accident and injury. The chaplain seems to do most of the talking, and is very protective of God's innocence, as is typical of religious authorities.

    Then in the midst of the sermonizing and religious education a ray of hope breaks in. Angela says, out of the blue, that it always helps when Josh visits. Josh is another rehab patient Angela's age who has similar injuries. Angela has found a new friend, one her age and in a predicament like her own. Then Angela asks the chaplain to assist her in blowing her nose, something she of course cannot do for herself. Angela cannot even hold a tissue. Next she asks the chaplain to wash her face, and afterward says, "That feels better, so much better. Thank you." We have the first recorded inkling of Angela's recovered will to live, faint as it may be. Angela dismisses the chaplain and asks that she return tomorrow. In her departure the chaplain of course feels the need to offer yet one more prayer.

    In due course Angela is discharged to a long-term treatment center. Her family is unable to care for her and seemingly little interested. We never hear about her further.

    II The Critique

    The published critiques were quite weak.

    The Editor's (Steve Nolan) critique merely summarizes, adding nothing.

    The Psychologist critic (Sian Cotton) points out that the chaplain aims to "be a sign of God's incarnational love" and to help Angela establish a relationship with God that would "center and sustain her" in the future. He calls the chaplain's interventions and clinical choices "spot on." He also claims that the chaplain's "spiritual care transformed and assisted Angela." He does add, appropriately, that the chaplain might have explored Angela's parental abandonment, along with her other losses resulting from her accident. His one assertion, that I heartily concur with, was that this was "one of the most emotionally...powerful" stories he has ever read. On balance, the psychologist critic failed in his assignment. He was far from "spot on."

    The Chaplain critic (Alister W. Bull) was the strongest of the three. He felt ambivalent about the religious focus that emerged in this case, as well as in the previous two cases. He charges that the chaplain often took the lead in introducing religious language and constructs with which they were familiar. I wish he had been less ambivalent and more direct, but nevertheless I say "bravo to the chaplain critic!"

    III Author's Notes

    Clinical pastoral criticism in the U.S., coming as it does out of the Boisen movement, is a tradition of strong clinical criticism. The critics in this case hardly qualify as strong. Except for the one offered by the chaplain critic, the critiques of this case were almost useless.

    Overall Angela's chaplain assumed too much of the role of God's little defense attorney. She should already know that that's a role, ever since Job, that no one should undertake under any circumstances. How could anyone defend the turning of a lively 17-year-old girl into a quadriplegic? Who would even want to? But who can put God in the dock? It's a case one cannot win.

    The proper posture of a clinical chaplain is agnostic, regardless of the chaplain's own personal beliefs and allegiances. The clinical role demands it. In this era, chaplains present themselves to persons of many different faiths, and faiths within faiths as well as persons of no faith at all. A proper clinician does not represent any specific religion or tradition if the chaplain wants to remain a clinician. Indoctrination and proselytizing do not belong in the clinical setting. The chaplain in this case was continually promoting her own pious beliefs. That is not acceptable.

    I think we must be suspicious of the chaplain's cavalier dismissal of Angela's own congregational minister on the grounds that Angela didn't relate to him. Angela was in no condition to relate to anyone for much of her time in the hospital. Unless there are clear contraindications— and there may be— the chaplain should encourage the connection between the minister and Angela. One visit can hardly be determinative. Angela has only meager support from her family. The chance that any minister might take an interest in her should be valued on its face. We have to be suspicious that discounting- the minister is rooted in the half millennium of hostility between Catholics and Protestants, and wonder in this case if the chaplain's own Catholicism was skewing her assessment of Angela's Protestant minister. The minister and the chaplain were, after all, in a competitive role during Angela's hospitalization. Suspicion is warranted.

    The one point in the case that was clearly redemptive, in my view, was Angela's reporting that it always helps when the 17-year-old Josh, a quadriplegic like herself, comes to visit. Mirabile dictu, she has found a boy for a friend, a boy immobilized like herself, and in that she has found, perhaps, even the will to live. Then she asked the chaplain to help her blow her nose and then to wash her face. "That feels better, so much better. Thank you," she said, and then asked the chaplain to return the next day. The quadriplegic 17-year-old Angela has found a will to live, if only for that moment. It's enough to make a grown man weep.

    Buried in all the chaplain's religiosity and talkativeness, Angela must have sensed that there was a compassionate human being in there, human enough to be asked to blow her nose and wash her face.

    This case demonstrates that we can be instruments of healing sometimes even when our skills abandon us and our awareness is dim. Perhaps it is a matter of simply being human, utterly human: blowing the nose and washing the face of a young quadriplegic girl who has just met a boy she likes.

    I do conclude that the chaplain in this case was ultimately a blessing to Angela—but in spite of herself. It was a very close thing. The chaplain made a revelatory confession in her concluding paragraph, stating, "I entered Angela's darkness while keeping my eyes on the light of hope." This tells me that the chaplain's own countertransference was so strong that she could hardly bear staying focused on the patient. For her own protection—and sanity, perhaps—she piled high her religious teaching and her piety as a defense against the horror of Angela's predicament. But enough humanity broke through her anxiety, enabling the chaplain to reach Angela. Perhaps one day she will be able to do much more.

    The fact that the chaplain in this case now is teaching other chaplains as well as medical students and psychiatric residents about the work of chaplaincy should sound the alarm to any who care about the profession. I do wish this chaplain would get into advanced clinical pastoral training that is psychodynamically oriented, in the Boisen tradition. Her heart seems to be right, but her practice is very much lacking.

    I do wonder what eventually happened in Angela's life, and in Josh's. They are now in their mid-twenties. If they are alive. I fear the worst.

    Raymond Lawrence

    Editor's Note: This is the third article of a series written by Dr. Lawrence critiquing the clinical case studies found in An Extended Review of Spiritual Care in Practice: Case Studies in Healthcare Chaplaincy by George Fitchett & Steve Nolan, Editors). Additional articles on the subject will be published on the Pastoral Report.

    Please review:

    Article One:

    Article Two:

  • 16 Jul 2015 11:52 PM | Perry Miller, Editor (Administrator)

    The following announcement appeared on the (UAMS) website:

    "CAPPT Accreditation of UAMS Clinical Pastoral Education Training Program

    "On June 10, 2015, the Clinical Pastoral Education Training program at the University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences (UAMS) was granted full accreditation by the Commission for Pastoral and Psychotherapy Training (CAPPT). UAMS, under the leadership of CPSP Diplomate in Supervision George Hankins-Hull, is the first College of Pastoral Supervision and Psychotherapy program to receive CAPPT accreditation. CAPPT accreditation is an acknowledgment of the strength and quality of a training program.

    CAPPT accreditation is the result of a rigorous audit of a Clinical Pastoral Education Training Center’s CPSP Accreditation process, involving a review of the Training Center’s self-study materials together with the CPSP site team’s report of the site visit. CAPPT seeks to assure that the CPSP Accreditation process is entirely consistent with CPSP Standards of Accreditation, and comparable with ‘best practices and standards’ of cognate accrediting organizations involved in professional training, i.e., the American Association of Marriage and Family Therapists, the Association for Graduate Medical Education, and the Association of Professional Chaplains.

    A successful accreditation review designates a training program as educationally and fiscally sound, with clear administrative support for the continued functioning integrity of the training center. CAPPT accreditation assures trainees and potential employers that the training program meets the most rigorous standards of the profession.

    A CPSP training center which receives CAPPT Accreditation may indicate on the Training Center’s website that it has achieved this seminal industry designation.

    CPSP anticipates that all of its CPE training programs will be submitting their programs to the CAPPT Accreditation process for review."

    George Hankins-Hull, Susan McDougal and George Buck

    Congratulations to George Hankins-Hull, Director, his CPE supervisory staff and to the University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences for this achievement of excellence.

    George Hankins-Hull, Director
    University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences

    Editor's Note: For information about the Commission for Pastoral and Psychotherapy Training (CAPPT) click here.

  • 13 Jul 2015 11:42 PM | Perry Miller, Editor (Administrator)

    Arriving during the midnight hours at Dover, Massachusetts for a six-day international residential training was an experience I will not soon forget.

    The conference, presented by the A.K. Rice Institute, was titled “Learning for Leadership 2015: Working Across Differences” and was billed as “An International Experiential Leadership Opportunity.” The event was held at Boston College’s Connors Family Retreat and Conference Center, which dates back to the early 1900s. Boston College is situated on 280 acres of land along the Charles River, offering a variety of wonderful hiking and running trails through wooded areas, wetlands, gardens, bocce ball greens and basketball courts. The comfortable temperatures, along with pesky mosquitoes, hooting owls, an orchestra of tree frogs and frequent deer sightings, all contributed to a very memorable experience.

    Being an International conference, participants came from as far away as the Faroe Islands, Alaska, Hawaii, Germany, the United Kingdom and Ontario, Canada, as well as many members of the administrative staff who reside outside of the United States. Membership included a large number of working professionals and leaders in the fields of behavioral health, education, government, and business. A respectable 25% of the attendees came from CPSP.

    The learning environment was intensely challenging, unconventional and practical. It provided unique opportunities for the most valuable kind of learning: experiential. In my assigned small group, I had the opportunity to continue learning from my CPSP colleagues as well as to gain fresh insights from members from Minnesota, Ontario, and the UK.  I made enlightened discoveries about the unconscious nature and behavior in groups – and about myself. Sometimes, the learning was emotionally challenging. During one brutally honest session, I learned where my personal responses come from and how they intersect with the interests of the group. I came to understand my responsibility for engagement and not, as I’m often inclined in group settings, to withdraw and simply listen to others.

    Our assignment was to build a new organization — quickly. From this exercise and the inherent group dynamics, I gained a better understanding of leadership at the interface of an individual, groups and organizations.  The stress of building a new institution was exhausting and painful at times, but allowed me to see how the conscious and unconscious interactions of every member influences change, giving me a unique and valuable opportunity to study various aspects of how people and organizations work.

    This conference provided me with an extraordinary opportunity to “tune in” to the frequency of group and organizational life experiences that’s always present, but virtually never approachable due to everyday work demands.  I found the experiential learning, as well as the opportunity for reflection in small groups with other participants of different cultures and beliefs, to be sometimes exhilarating, often exhausting, but always richly satisfying.

    Regardless of whether you are new or a well-seasoned member of The College of Pastoral Supervision and Psychotherapy, or perhaps still completing your CPE training, I highly recommend that you challenge yourself and plan to attend one of these conferences. The experiences you will gain in group relations work will bestow indescribable benefits to you, those you serve and our entire CPSP community.

    Ruth Zollinger
    Board Certified Clinical Chaplain

  • 07 Jul 2015 11:37 PM | Perry Miller, Editor (Administrator)

    In a recent article published on entitled: Prophets of the People or Chaplains of the Status Quo?, William Alberts, PhD launches a searing attack against the Association of Clinical Pastoral Education for its failure to live up to its mission statement as "... the first and leading self-described “multicultural, multi-faith organization devoted to providing education and improving the quality of ministry and pastoral care offered by spiritual caregivers of all faiths through the clinical education methods of Clinical Pastoral Education.”

    Although his article was written just prior to the Charleston, SC slaughter of the of those gather in Emmanuel Mother Church for prayer, Alberts' article is disturbingly and profoundly relevant to the event.

    I quote: 
    “The Powers that be.” ACPE may fear losing its U.S. Department of Education endorsement if it becomes too political. ACPE may also avoid political issues, fearing losing the goose with the golden egg, as the Chaplain Corps uses ACPE training for military chaplains, with CPE centers also on military bases and in VA hospitals. In the latter, the supervisors may be military, but are also ACPE certified. It is the politics of religion that often keeps religion out of politics—out of risky political issues."

    CPSP escapes his critical critique, although his critique, might equally apply to CPSP and other pastoral care and counseling organizations.

    Stating the above, however, as Publisher and Editor of the Pastoral Report, I published position statements written by CPSP leadership related to the Iraq war, gay marriage and the Charleston, SC killings. These were not personal opinions. They were official public positions of CPSP. The first two public positions by CPSP were disturbing and criticized by some members of the CPSP community. In the face of such public and controversial stance by CPSP leadership, a number of CPSP members ended their membership with CPSP or found a way to attack the CPSP leadership on other issues as a subterfuge.

    Here are links to CPSP public statements:

    October 14, 2003. The CPSP Governing Council Meeting in Washington, DC Issues Position on War with Iraq addressed to President George Bush:

    ...The drumbeat for war emanating from the national leadership is deeply troubling and divisive. The current national leadership may well be privy, as you claim, to secret information affecting the nation’s security and well being. While it is almost impossible for citizens to assess the weight of evidence that impels us toward war, the call for terror to meet terror in the case of Iraq leaves us wary. ...

    March 14, 2013. CPSP Public Declaration: Commitment to Marriage Equality

    "The College of Pastoral Supervision and Psychotherapy (CPSP) declares publicly in the name of justice its dismay with the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) passed by Congress in 1996 and the subsequent Defense of Marriage Act laws passed by some states designed to penalizes persons due to their sexual identity.

    The College of Pastoral Supervision and Psychotherapy endorses the right of civil marriage and that it should be available to all who wish to make this relational commitment.

    ... Every human being is entitled to justice and dignity as a given right and that we have an obligation to respect and defend the dignity of every human being and of every loving relationship including the relationship of raising future generations..."

    June 19, 2015. Raymond Lawrence, CPSP General Secretary, Response to Charleston, SC Tragedy:
    "The ghastly event at Mother Emanuel AME Church Thursday in Charleston, South Carolina, was an unspeakable act of violence seemingly motivated explicitly by racial hatred.

    We must do all we can to counter these kinds of outrageous assaults, and to be united with those who are victimized by them.

    This incident calls attention to the disturbing rise of both overt and covert hostility in this country, particularly directed against racial minorities and the poor.

    We in CPSP must do all we can to be in solidarity with the abused, the assaulted, and the oppressed. This is our moral and our prophetic pastoral responsibility.

    I call for all in CPSP as well as those beyond the boundaries of our community, to renew our commitment to work toward a just and loving community for all people, with special concern for racial minorities and the poor among us."

    I searched for similar official statements from the ACPE and found none. If they do not exist, it provides credence to William Albert's critique. If they exist, Albert's critique is off the mark. If Dr. Alberts is correct, however, ACPE is subject to Albert's critique:

    "...the Association for Clinical Pastoral Education’s emphasis on “cultural competency” apparently did not lead its members to issue a policy statement on a major issue raging around them at their May meeting in Atlanta. That major issue, which continues to draw protests nationwide: the killing of black men and youths by white police officers in Ferguson, Staten Island, Cleveland, North Charleston, Baltimore and other cities. One would think that a self-proclaimed commitment to “heal a hurting world” would lead ACPE to use its annual meeting, especially with all members gathered, to declare “Black Lives Matter!,” and to issue a policy statement and plan of action to join with other community groups in addressing the “hurting world” of persons of color."

    Below is the link to William Alberts' Article, "Prophets of the People or Chaplains of the Status Quo?"

    The sad truth is that William Alberts, in general, is on the mark and that we in the clinical pastoral movement, not just the ACPE, have sold our soul for a space in the public market place.

    Perry Miller, Editor
    Pastoral Report

    Perry Miller, Editor
    Pastoral Report

    Note: Those wishing to respond to Dr. Alberts' article can do so: William Alberts

    His recent book, The Counterpunching Minister (who couldn't be "preyed" away) can be found on